[CLN-list] CLN 1.2.0

[Richard B. Kreckel]

Dear Jörg,

Joerg Arndt wrote:
> The reasons that the CLN and GiNaC packages were a bit of a
> maintenance nightmare were the things I mentioned in the
> mail before.  These suggestions should be seriously considered.
> Most fixes we needed were so tricky that I had to bother the
> compiler folks pretty much constantly!


What reasons in that other mail explain why CLN or GiNaC were or are a 
maintenance nightmare? They compile out of the box using GCC, they pass 
make check, install cleanly and generally work. If not, why not send a 
bug report?

I hope you don't mean failing to compile with -W -Wall -Wconversion 
-Wsign-promo -Wsign-compare -Wunused -Wshadow -Wundef -Werror.

Cheers
    -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>