[CLN-list] CLN versus ia64

[Alexei Sheplyakov]

Hello!

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:24:36PM +1100, Joerg Arndt wrote:

> IIRC(3) the itanium arch was the worst and IIRC(4) we tagged
> CLN etc as DOES_NOT_BUILD on the arch because nobody was much
> interested in fixing there.

Interesting. According to

http://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=cln

CLN happens to (auto-)build on ia64. There was a couple of failures,
but I guess that's very far from DOES_NOT_BUILD. That said, I have no
itanium boxes there, so I can't check if there are some runtime errors.

Best regards,
	Alexei

-- 
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.cebix.net/pipermail/cln-list/attachments/20080122/3bba798f/attachment.pgp