GiNaC/ginac print.h ...

[Richard B. Kreckel]

Hanoi,

On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Pearu Peterson wrote:
> Now, with this new print() standard, nothing has changed. I still have to
> re-implement print() function in the same way again:(. But looking
> forward to future where you might support output types such as LaTeX,
> MathML, etc. that could be useful also from Python, my approach doesn't
> feel right. And on the other hand, you hardly want to support Python
> (or any other third party language) output formats.

Why not?  Isn't this exactly what class print_context and decendants are
supposed to be good for provided we get the right patches for inclusion
into the GiNaC::*::print() methods?

Regards
      -richy.
-- 
Richard Kreckel
<Richard.Kreckel at Uni-Mainz.DE>
<http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/>