[GiNaC-devel] Factoring, again (Factory)
Richard B. Kreckel
kreckel at thep.physik.uni-mainz.de
Mon Aug 23 22:15:04 CEST 2004
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> So, assuming I have summarized the situation correctly, which way?
A while ago, I had followed the way of invoking the (powerful) univariate
factoring in NTL but gave that up (due to non-technical reasons). I had
the impression that the architecture of NTL was much more consistent than
that of the other candidates. Also, I would be reluctant to add too many
prerequesite libraries (libfac + ntl).
As for the interface, I think the issue is much simpler than in the case
of CLN: there're already normal(), fracfree() and friends for guidance.
Maybe another routine for power users that populates a vector of
factors/exponents would be handy.
Regards
-richy.
--
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>
More information about the GiNaC-devel
mailing list