[GiNaC-devel] patch for numeric.cpp

[Richard B. Kreckel]

Jens Vollinga wrote:

> Chris Dams wrote:
>
>> I found out that 1.has(0) returns true. Iteresting ;-o. A patch is 
>> attached.
>>
>> This made me wonder about 2.has(2*I). It returns true. Is this really 
>> the idea?
>
>
> I am not sure, but I don't think so.

Definitely not.

> I modified your patch slighty to cover that case too (and put it into 
> CVS).

That patch appears to meet up with the comment whereas the original code 
didn't.  ;-)     Great!

  -richy.

-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>