[GiNaC-devel] Class container vs. the holy standard?

[Richard B. Kreckel]

David Fang wrote:

>
>I might see what other template metaprogramming techniques have to offer.
>I'm only a newbie in this subject, still learning on the fly.  I would be
>very interested to hear what solution you end up using.
>  
>

The problem is we can't have template <template <class, class> class C> 
class container besides template <template <class> class C> class 
container. But in this case, I think we can just name the former 
diffently, for example container_with_allocator. The attached patch is a 
quick shot: on first sight it's uglier that what has been suggested 
before (writing template <template< class T, class A = std::allocator<T> 
 > class C> class container, but it doesn't turn all container types 
into container-assuming-STL types.

It has the problem that it still fails to link and on gcc-4.2 it even 
fails to compile with very strange error mesages from the assembler. 
But, heck, who cares!?

-richy.

-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gcc42.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 19150 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.cebix.net/pipermail/ginac-devel/attachments/20060425/5d9734f5/gcc42-0001.bin