[GiNaC-devel] Class container vs. the holy standard?

Jens Vollinga vollinga at physik.uni-wuppertal.de
Thu Jul 20 12:03:24 CEST 2006


Dear Chris,

Chris Dams schrieb:
>>> This might be a good time for asking about the status of HEAD and the 
>>> branch. Are there any projects pending? Jens, could you roll a release 
>>> (whichever version) in the not so far future (including regenerated 
>>> Bison files)?
>> Anytime until Monday evening :-) And then again starting from one week 
>> later on. Any preference?
> 
> I have some patches pending that should go into HEAD before releasing 1.4.
> It is about improvements for automatic dummy index renaming. If a
> multiplication is constructed by mul::map(), GiNaC does not yet rename
> dummy indices. This changes some signatures in header files. Should be
> finished soon. I'm currently debugging.

I just thought and wrote (not clearly enough :-)) just about a 1.3.5 
release.
So, no need to hurry, yet.

Regards,
Jens



More information about the GiNaC-devel mailing list