[GiNaC-devel] [PATCH] Faster, better (recursive descent) expression parser.
Sergei Steshenko
sergstesh at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 21 12:08:16 CEST 2008
--- On Thu, 8/21/08, Jens Vollinga <jensv at nikhef.nl> wrote:
> From: Jens Vollinga <jensv at nikhef.nl>
> Subject: Re: [GiNaC-devel] [PATCH] Faster, better (recursive descent) expression parser.
> To: "GiNaC development list" <ginac-devel at ginac.de>
> Date: Thursday, August 21, 2008, 1:56 AM
> Hi,
>
> Alexei Sheplyakov schrieb:
> > First of all, autogen is not necessary to build GiNaC
> from tarball. Secondly,
>
> ups, I overlooked this fact. Then I don't mind.
>
> > I wonder how those admins compile GCC :)
>
> Out of curiosity: What do you mean? I don't have
> autogen on the two
> boxes where I regularly compile gcc ... and it works. It is
> probably
> only needed if you do fancy things, or isn't it?
>
> Regards,
> Jens
> _______________________________________________
> GiNaC-devel mailing list
> GiNaC-devel at ginac.de
> https://www.cebix.net/mailman/listinfo/ginac-devel
Guys, thanks to the standard
./configure --prefix=......
make
make install
sequence if one is persistent enough, he/she can build everything from
scratch not having root permissions.
I have even automated the process in my AppsFromScratch; 'ginac' is built
among many other targets. Gnu autotools are also built, as well as 'gcc'.
So, in this subthread you are not discussing a critical issue
(presence/absence of GNU autottols), but rather an issue of convenience.
Regards,
Sergei.
More information about the GiNaC-devel
mailing list