[GiNaC-devel] about "official" repositories

[Alexei Sheplyakov]

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 02:26:36PM +0100, Jens Vollinga wrote:
 
> yes, of course. I should have written:
> BTW, I do not intend to have an own "publicly available" git repository.

That's fine.
 
> > especially this paragraph:
> > 
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#public-repositories
> 
> I don't understand what you mean.

"However, the more common way to do this is to maintain a separate
public repository (usually on a different host) for others
to pull changes from. This is usually more convenient, and allows you
to cleanly separate private work in progress from
publicly visible work."

Best regards,
	Alexei

-- 
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.cebix.net/pipermail/ginac-devel/attachments/20080304/def0999b/attachment.sig