[GiNaC-devel] indexes of clifford objects

[Richard B. Kreckel]

On 06/11/2011 07:10 PM, Vladimir V. Kisil wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:38:54 +0000, Alexei Sheplyakov<alexei.sheplyakov at gmail.com>  said:
>      ASh>  I don't think this artificial restrictions is a good idea. Why
>      ASh>  don't we remove that bogus assertion instead?
>
> 	I do not qualify to participate in this discussion due to my
>    limiting knowledge in software design. As a user I think that
>    admitting idx make life easier, however I can survive if it will be
>    restricted to varidx.

Oh, in this case, I am sure this is not a question of software design!

It depends on how useful a clifford with idx is in practice. You are 
saying that allowing idx makes life easier. Well, I think this settles it.

   -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>