[GiNaC-devel] indexes of clifford objects

[Richard B. Kreckel]

Hi!

On 06/12/2011 01:57 PM, Vladimir V. Kisil wrote:
> 	Yes, in the simplistic approach to Clifford algebra there is no need
>    to assign any covariance to indexes: they are simply labels to
>    distinguish different generators.

Great! I've patched it. Thanks a lot.

Sadly, it turns out that clifford_check6 triggers yet another assertion, 
this time in clifford.cpp:1249. There, ex_to<indexed>(e.op(j)), however 
e.op(j) is actually a power object!

It seems to have been introduced by b4631c1661b1, see 
<http://www.ginac.de/pipermail/ginac-devel/2004-October/000708.html>.

Any idea?

   -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>