[GiNaC-devel] Fix for pattern matching
    Alexei Sheplyakov 
    alexei.sheplyakov at gmail.com
       
    Fri Dec  6 09:47:19 CET 2013
    
    
  
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Matthias Dellweg
<dellweg at tp1.uni-duesseldorf.de> wrote:
> while using GiNaC, I came across a strange behaviour with pattern
> matching in products having more than one wildcard. The match succeeded
> in a probablistic fashion.
Could you please give some examples so I can make a proper test case?
> My conclusion is, that expairseq::match dishonors the rule, that repl_lst will
> remain unchanged whenever false  is returned. See the attached patch,
> which solves the problem for me.
Thanks for the patch. I've glanced through it and it looks reasonable.
I'll do more test
and merge it during the next week (I'm a bit busy at the moment).
Best regards,
       Alexei
    
    
More information about the GiNaC-devel
mailing list