[GiNaC-devel] info() methods for transcendental functions

[Vladimir V. Kisil]

>>>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 00:54:16 +0200, "Richard B. Kreckel" <kreckel at in.terlu.de> said:

    RK> Dear Vladimir, On 9/3/22 22:59, Vladimir V. Kisil wrote:
    >> I am proposing a small patch which provides some elementary
    >> info() methods to GiNaC predefined transcendental functions. Only
    >> easy answers are sought, which can be decided on info tests of
    >> the functions arguments. From such coarse viewpoint functions are
    >> grouped into several classes and the respective routines can be
    >> shared.

    RK> Thanks for the patch; the logic is good.

    RK> But we should all heed compiler warnings!

    You are right, Richard. It is good that you noted and fixed the
  spurious typo, but I shall review patches more careful before
  submission.  
-- 
Vladimir V. Kisil                 http://www.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~kisilv/
  Book:      Geometry of Mobius Maps       https://doi.org/10.1142/p835
  Soft:      Geometry of cycles         http://moebinv.sourceforge.net/
  Jupyter notebooks:        https://github.com/vvkisil?tab=repositories


    RK> And so it turns out
    RK> that the patch contains a really interesting typo: 'deafult'
    RK> instead of 'default'. This compiles: it's just a label due to
    RK> the colon. Fixing it makes GCC shut up the warning "control
    RK> reaches end of non-void function". (I first thought GCC is
    RK> overly grouchy. I've never seen such a bug before.)

    RK>   -richy.  -- Richard B. Kreckel