Is ncmul depreciated?

[Richard B. Kreckel]

On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Pearu Peterson wrote:
> I have noticed that
>   ncmul(2,a,3)
> results
>   mul(a,6).
> 
> Why is this type change ncmul -> mul? Will ncmul be depreciated in future?

No, ncmul is not deprecated and will be needed.  The above simplification
is just the specified behaviour of ncmul::eval().  Looks like the rules in
<http://www.ginac.de/reference/ncmul_cpp-source.html#l00329> actually work.

Regards
     -richy.
-- 
Richard Kreckel
<Richard.Kreckel at Uni-Mainz.DE>
<http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/>


-
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ginac-list at ginac.de with a subject of "unsubscribe".