complex conjugation
chrisd at sci.kun.nl
chrisd at sci.kun.nl
Mon Nov 24 10:24:05 CET 2003
Hello,
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> > I would say that just bluntly using the default behaviour, ignoring
> > possible problems, would be best.
>
> I guess that's right. What about non-analytic functions? We don't seem
> to have many, though, yet (just abs and csgn).
I already wrote the code for that and it looks like
static ex abs_conjugate(const ex & x)
{
return abs(x);
}
REGISTER_FUNCTION(abs, eval_func(abs_eval).
evalf_func(abs_evalf).
print_func<print_latex>(abs_print_latex).
print_func<print_csrc_float>(abs_print_csrc_float).
print_func<print_csrc_double>(abs_print_csrc_float).
conjugate_func(abs_conjugate));
static ex csgn_conjugate(const ex&x)
{
return csgn(x);
}
REGISTER_FUNCTION(csgn, eval_func(csgn_eval).
evalf_func(csgn_evalf).
series_func(csgn_series).
conjugate_func(csgn_conjugate));
The good news is that this already works fine. Currently I am hunting down
a segmentation fault in the complex conjugation of ncmuls.
Bye,
Chris Dams
More information about the GiNaC-list
mailing list