[GiNaC-list] FYI: CLN fork

[Alexei Sheplyakov]

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 02:49:27PM +0200, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
 
> Does (and will) GiNaC bother about what implementation of CLN is built onto?

All programs which work with original version of CLN should work with modified
one, anything else is a bug. Unfortunately my modifications break the binary
compatibility, so recompilation is required.

Best regards,
	Alexei

-- 
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.cebix.net/pipermail/ginac-list/attachments/20080827/a794281b/attachment.sig