[GiNaC-list] Non-reentrant code in GCD functions
Richard B. Kreckel
kreckel at ginac.de
Sun Jun 13 23:04:11 CEST 2010
Hi!
Jens Vollinga wrote:
> Am 13.06.2010 21:07, schrieb Alexei Sheplyakov:
>> Could you please be more specific? I can see several static const
>> variables,
>> for instance,
>
> like in primpart_content.cpp
>
> 44 void primpart_content(ex& pp, ex& c, ex e, const exvector& vars,
> 45 const long p)
> 46 {
> 47 static const ex ex1(1);
> 48 static const ex ex0(0);
Is there a reason why this code isn't using the flyweights from
utils.cpp directly? And, could these flyweights be safe in a threaded
environment? I would assume no thread ever deallocates them since their
refcount stays above zero all the time. Wrong?
Best wishes
-richy.
--
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>
More information about the GiNaC-list
mailing list