[GiNaC-list] Tricky way to control over dummy indices
Vladimir V. Kisil
kisilv at maths.leeds.ac.uk
Fri Jul 14 21:04:15 CEST 2017
>>>>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 22:54:35 +0430, esarcush esarcush <esarcush at gmail.com> said:
EE> Dear all, in expression
EE> { indexed(A, i, j) * indexed(B, j, k) }
EE> GiNaC is saying that the dummy index is "j" and "i, k" are
EE> free. Is there a way to determine dummy indices based on
EE> Einstein summation notation; namely all the indices in the
EE> latter be free.
My understanding of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_notation
is that in the above expression there is summation over j, thus it is
not free.
--
Vladimir V. Kisil http://www.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~kisilv/
Book: Geometry of Mobius Transformations http://goo.gl/EaG2Vu
Software: Geometry of cycles http://moebinv.sourceforge.net/
More information about the GiNaC-list
mailing list