[GiNaC-list] 回复: issue about series involving positive symbol
Feng Feng
F.Feng at outlook.com
Tue Jul 28 01:55:19 CEST 2020
Dear Vladimir,
Thanks so much for the quick fix, many thanks again.
Best regards!
Feng
________________________________
发件人: Vladimir V. Kisil <V.Kisil at leeds.ac.uk>
发送时间: 2020年7月27日 22:22
收件人: ginac-list at ginac.de <ginac-list at ginac.de>; GiNaC-devel List <ginac-devel at ginac.de>; Feng Feng <f.feng at outlook.com>
主题: Re: [GiNaC-list] 回复: issue about series involving positive symbol
Dear Feng,
Thanks for reporting this (rather severe) issue. I am attaching a patch to fix it. It also includes additional GiNaC self-check.
Best wishes,
Vladimir
PS. The previous not yet committed bugfix is attached as well.
--
Vladimir V. Kisil http://www.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~kisilv/
Book: Geometry of Mobius Maps https://doi.org/10.1142/p835
Soft: Geometry of cycles http://moebinv.sourceforge.net/
Jupyter notebooks: https://github.com/vvkisil/MoebInv-notebooks
________________________________________
From: GiNaC-list <ginac-list-bounces at ginac.de> on behalf of Feng Feng <f.feng at outlook.com>
Sent: 27 July 2020 02:23
To: ginac-list at ginac.de
Subject: [GiNaC-list] 回复: issue about series involving positive symbol
I got a more compact case for this issue, by changing the in1 and in2 to
ex in1 = reader("t^2/(3*m^2-t*m^2)/2");
ex in2 = reader("-(m^(-2)*(-3+t)^(-1)*t^2/2)");
sometimes we get the output:
in1-in2 = 0
diff = 0
while, for some other times, we get the output:
in1-in2 = 0
diff = 96*log(1/48)
it seems that the sign of the log term has been changed.
Best regards!
Feng
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ginac.de/pipermail/ginac-list/attachments/20200727/66001727/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the GiNaC-list
mailing list