[CLN-list] workaround in cl_nt_sqrtmodp.cc for gcc 3.5 branch?

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:44:31PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> 
> > Now I'd like to know if this a sign of yet another gcc regression before
> > reporting it?
> 
> Yes. This code compiles fine with gcc-3.3 (well, "fine" means that it
> takes 700 MB RAM to compile it), so a bug report to the GCC people is in
> order. It will be most convincing to show them the preprocessed C++ code and
> the result of "nm" on the g++ generated object file.

Done after cutting down to a small example:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17182

Regards,
Ralf