[CLN-list] workaround in cl_nt_sqrtmodp.cc for gcc 3.5 branch?

[Richard B. Kreckel]

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:44:31PM CEST:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > > Now I'd like to know if this a sign of yet another gcc regression before
> > > reporting it?
> >
> > Yes. This code compiles fine with gcc-3.3 (well, "fine" means that it
> > takes 700 MB RAM to compile it), so a bug report to the GCC people is in
> > order. It will be most convincing to show them the preprocessed C++ code and
> > the result of "nm" on the g++ generated object file.
>
> Done after cutting down to a small example:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17182

For the record: I just tried gcc-3.5-20040822 snapshot with Mark
Mitchell's patch for PR c++/17155 applied (17182 and 17155 are duplicates
of each other) and it fixes that problem.  It also successfully compiled
the entire library.

The number of GCC bugs CLN keeps triggering is simply amazing.

Regards
    -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>