[CLN-list] CLN 1.2.1 -- silent ABI change?

[Alexei Sheplyakov]

Dear Richard,

On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:38:10AM +0200, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
 
> I don't think so. It would make the two functions unsafe. But these 
> functions can be used only by programs compiled against CLN-1.2.0. 
> Programs compiled using CLN-1.2.1 are safe anyway as the bad signature 
> doesn't exist and programs compiled using CLN-1.2.2 are safe because the 
> bad signature is not exposed and, hence, not used.

OK, this sounds reasonable.

Best regards,
	Alexei

-- 
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.cebix.net/pipermail/cln-list/attachments/20080403/e5469eb5/attachment.sig