[CLN-list] CLN 1.2.1 -- silent ABI change?

[Richard B. Kreckel]

Alexei Sheplyakov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:38:10AM +0200, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
>  
>> I don't think so. It would make the two functions unsafe. But these 
>> functions can be used only by programs compiled against CLN-1.2.0. 
>> Programs compiled using CLN-1.2.1 are safe anyway as the bad signature 
>> doesn't exist and programs compiled using CLN-1.2.2 are safe because the 
>> bad signature is not exposed and, hence, not used.
> 
> OK, this sounds reasonable.

I've checked in such a patch and plan to release CLN-1.2.2 tomorrow.

   -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>