[GiNaC-devel] more patch

[Chris Dams]

Dear Jens,

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Jens Vollinga wrote:

> Chris Dams wrote:
> > Actually, I am not really entirely certain if this subs_option is the
> > right way to go. On the one hand, the fact that constructing powers of
> 
>  > I would appreciate some input on this issue.
>
> is the new subs_option only to conserve compability with unknown user 
> programs (sorry, I didn't dig into the patch code yet) ?

Also with GiNaCs own symmetrization over dummy indices (as done by
simplify_indexed). Clearly it is wrong to rename the dummy indices in this
case.

Best,
Chris