[GiNaC-list] ginac fails tests

[Kim Lux]

Thanks for the tips.  I'll test these out next week and report back. 

Kim


On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 10:57 +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Sheplyakov Alexei wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:59:04PM -0700, Kim Lux wrote:
> > > creating times
> > > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/***/Desktop/ecco
> > > install/GiNaC-1.3.0/check'
> > > make  check-TESTS
> > > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/****/Desktop/ecco
> > > install/GiNaC-1.3.0/check'
> > > GiNaC will now take an exam with specific input (like a pupils' exam):
> > > ./exams.ref exams.out differ: byte 1, line 1
> > > FAIL: run_exams
> > > GiNaC will now run through some rather costly random consistency checks:
> > > ./checks.ref checks.out differ: byte 1, line 1
> > > FAIL: run_checks
> > > GiNaC will now run through some basic timings:
> > > ./times.ref times.out differ: byte 1, line 1
> > > FAIL: run_times
> > > ===================
> > > 3 of 3 tests failed
> > > ===================
> > > make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
> > > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/***/Desktop/ecco
> > > install/GiNaC-1.3.0/check'
> > > make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
> > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/***/Desktop/ecco
> > > install/GiNaC-1.3.0/check'
> > > make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/***/Desktop/ecco install/GiNaC-1.3.0'
> > > make: *** [check] Error 2
> > >
> > >
> > > Any ideas ???
> >
> > 1) you are using "wrong" g++, i.e. its version does NOT match the one
> > your CLN package was compiled with;
> >
> > 2) you have got
> > 	a) two (or more) versions of CLN installed,
> > 	b) tricky combination of compiler/linker flags, e.g.
> > 	   CPPFLAGS pointing to headers of CLN version X, and LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> > 	   pointing to SOs of CLN version Y (Y!=X);
> 
> 3) Static variable initialization fiasco.  There's a patch, over here:
>    <http://thep.physik.uni-mainz.de/pipermail/ginac-devel/2005-January/000751.html>.
>    The next version is going to have it included.
> 
> Regards
>   -richy.
-- 
Kim Lux,  Diesel Research Inc.